Guelph WWTP: Belt Press Downtime Cut From 3 Days to 6 Hours

Home 9 Case Studies and Results 9 Guelph WWTP: Belt Press Downtime Cut From 3 Days to 6 Hours
Key results
No new struvite in 60+ days
Downtime 3 days to 6 hours
$16–40k a year avoided

Summary

At Guelph WWTP, a HydroFLOW® i160 on the belt press feed stopped new struvite forming over more than 60 days of continuous running. Maintenance downtime fell from three days to six hours, and the outside pressure-wash contractors, previously $16,000 to $40,000 a year, were no longer needed. For a plant whose centrate line could block solid, the drains and drum openings photographed at day 60 show the difference.

Case Study from HydroFLOW Canada

Belt press struvite control at Guelph WWTP

Belt press struvite control was costing Guelph Wastewater Treatment Plant days of downtime. The plant serves the City of Guelph and the surrounding Guelph and Eramosa townships in Ontario and dewaters its sludge on Ashbrook belt presses, where hard struvite built up on rollers, drains, bearings, pistons and drums, and the six-inch centrate discharge piping could block completely. One HydroFLOW® i160 was installed on the steel feed pipe upstream of a belt press for a 60-day trial. No new struvite build-up was reported over more than 60 days of continuous running, maintenance downtime fell from three days to six hours, and outside pressure-wash contractors were no longer needed.

The Challenges

  • Belt press struvite control was needed to cut costly, labour-intensive maintenance
  • Six-inch centrate discharge piping could block completely
  • Deposits built up on rollers, drains, bearings, pistons and drums
  • Removing hard deposits meant extensive cleaning and shutdowns of up to three days
  • Outside pressure-wash contractors cost $16,000 to $40,000 a year

The Solution

  • Unit installed: one HydroFLOW® i160
  • Installation point: steel feed pipe upstream of the Ashbrook belt press inlet
  • Pipe: 150 mm (6 in) OD steel
  • Trial: 60 days of continuous operation

For belt press struvite control without changing the dewatering process, the i160 was fitted to the steel feed pipe just upstream of the press inlet, so the sludge was treated before it reached the press and the centrate discharge system. The press then ran continuously for 60 days, and its drains, drum openings and pipework were inspected and photographed at the end.

Testimonial

“After 60 days of continuous operation the result was significantly positive, the build-up of Struvite was eliminated”
— Rony George, Plant Maintenance Supervisor

Key Outcomes

R

No new struvite in 60+ days

R

$16–40k a year contractors avoided

R

92% less maintenance downtime

R

Discharge blockages virtually ended

Independent Verification

All results in this study were measured and verified by third-party facilities managers and technical staff.

Ready to see more?

Ready to explore sustainable water treatment?

Get in touch to find out how HydroFLOW® can work for you.

© 2026 Hydropath Technology Ltd. All rights reserved