Fortune 100 HQ: 85% Less Blowdown, $73k Saved

Home 9 Case Studies and Results 9 Fortune 100 HQ: 85% Less Blowdown, $73k Saved
Key results
85% blowdown reduction
75% chemical reduction
$73k annual water and energy saving

Case Study from HydroFLOW USA

Cooling tower blowdown reduction at a Fortune 100 headquarters

Cooling tower blowdown reduction was a priority at the headquarters campus of a Fortune 100 company, where scale and biofouling in a large cooling plant meant high chemical dosing, frequent maintenance, heavy blowdown and the energy penalty of fouled heat transfer surfaces. In April 2016 HydroFLOW® Custom units were installed across the cooling towers and chillers as part of a Total Water Management programme, treating towers and chillers together rather than one at a time. Blowdown fell by 85%, and combined savings on water, chemicals, maintenance and energy came to $73,000 a year, with a measured carbon reduction alongside.

The Challenges

  • Cooling tower blowdown reduction was a priority as scale and biofouling built up across the plant
  • High chemical dosing was required to keep the system under control
  • Maintenance and blowdown were both frequent
  • Maintenance and energy costs were rising together
  • The site wanted a whole-system approach rather than a single fix

The Solution

  • Units installed: HydroFLOW® Custom units
  • Installation point: across the cooling towers and chillers
  • Installed: April 2016
  • System: treated under a Total Water Management programme

The units went in across the towers and chillers together, so the whole plant was treated as one system. The signal disrupts the conditions that bond scale and biofilm to surfaces, letting the towers run at higher cycles without fouling. Cooling tower blowdown reduction reached 85%, chemical dosing and maintenance dropped with it, and heat transfer surfaces stayed clean.

Key Outcomes

R

Blowdown water use reduced by 85%

R

Maintenance frequency reduced by 50%

R

Chemical use cut 75% with performance held

R

Annual savings reached $73,400

Independent Verification

All results in this study were measured and verified by third-party facilities managers and technical staff.

Summary

Blowdown fell by 85% and the programme saved $73,000 a year across water, chemicals, maintenance and energy, with a carbon reduction recorded alongside. Large campuses tend to treat towers and chillers as separate maintenance problems. The Total Water Management approach used here treated them as one system, and the $73,000 figure reflects savings across all of it.

Ready to see more?

Ready to explore sustainable water treatment?

Get in touch to find out how HydroFLOW® can work for you.

© 2026 Hydropath Technology Ltd. All rights reserved