Arizona Chillers: 68% Less Blowdown, Less Chemical

Home 9 Case Studies and Results 9 Arizona Chillers: 68% Less Blowdown, Less Chemical
Key results
68% blowdown reduction
7,000 microsiemens conductivity
5.5 month trial duration

Case Study from HydroFLOW USA

Chiller water treatment in a desert climate

Chiller water treatment in a desert climate was costing an Arizona chiller plant scarce water, with frequent blowdown cycles and continuous chemical dosing used to hold scale at bay while staying within industry standards. In Arizona, cooling water is not just an operating cost but a scarce resource that a site cannot easily replace. For a 5.5-month trial, one HydroFLOW® i8 inch Custom unit was fitted to the condenser water line between the tower and the chiller. The system ran at high conductivity with far less blowdown and less chemical. Blowdown fell by 68%, and the chiller and heat exchangers were clean at the end of the trial.

The Challenges

  • Chiller water treatment in a desert climate had to cut blowdown, which consumed scarce water
  • Continuous chemical dosing was required to control scale
  • Water scarcity was affecting site operations
  • The plant had to stay within industry water treatment standards
  • Heat exchanger fouling was a constant risk at higher conductivity

The Solution

  • Unit installed: one HydroFLOW® i8 inch Custom
  • Installation point: condenser water line, between the cooling tower and the chiller
  • Trial: 5 months

The unit was fitted on the condenser water line and the system was then allowed to run at high conductivity rather than blowing down to hold scale back. The signal disrupts the conditions that bond scale to surfaces, so the chiller and heat exchangers stayed clean. For chiller water treatment in a desert climate, the 68% cut in blowdown was the headline result, with chemical dosing reduced as well.

Key Outcomes

R

Blowdown water use cut by 68%

R

Operated at 7,000 microsiemens conductivity

R

Chemical dosing stopped except small biocide

R

Inspection showed minimal soft scale

Independent Verification

All results in this study were measured and verified by third-party facilities managers and technical staff.

Summary

Blowdown fell by 68% over the 5.5-month trial, and the site stayed within industry water treatment standards throughout. In arid regions the cost of cooling water is set by scarcity, not by the utility bill. A 68% cut in blowdown is a resilience result as much as a financial one, and it came with less chemical and clean heat exchangers.

Ready to see more?

Ready to explore sustainable water treatment?

Get in touch to find out how HydroFLOW® can work for you.

© 2026 Hydropath Technology Ltd. All rights reserved